By PetervanSommers
Pet Van Sommers explains his feelings about analyzing jealousy through the lens of literature; from his 1988 book Jealousy.
It might seem obvious that some of the best material on jealousy should be in literature, so let me say a word about fiction.
Readers may be disgusted to learn that I have never been a great fan of Othello, nor of the Medea of Euripides, at least in their written forms. Academically I find fiction to have distinct strengths and limitations, and
I identify the split as lying between theory and evocation. Plots of novels and plays can be suggestive, but unless they are actually disguised biographies, they are doubtful sources
of evidence. Take one of the great literary treatments of jealousy: Tolstoy's Kreutzer Sonata. From the point at which the narrator, Pozdnychev, awakes at night in the county with an overwhelming feeling of rage and
dread, to the moment where he is trying to face the reality of having murdered his wife, the description is riveting. But
the material in that same story about the relationshup between youthful debauchery and later jealousy I found inauthentic,
and a reading of Tolstoy's own Epilogue confirms that that part of the exercise is quite artificial and didactic. But to read
Swann (I nearly said Proust) trying to extract information from Odette, or Anna Karenina's final struggle to rescue her relationship
with Vronsky before she kills herself, or the introspective passages dealing with alienation and exclusion in Simone de Beauvior's
novel L'Invitée can't be passed over, any more than the eloquent letters and diaries that tell us how people like Betrand Russell, Vita Sackville-West
or Freud himself felt, day by day, about their passions.
![[Top]](art/EndFleur_40x21.gif "Top")
PEEK
Ftrain.com is the website of Paul Ford and his pseudonyms. It is showing its age. I'm rewriting the code but it's taking some
time.
FACEBOOK
There is a Facebook group.
TWITTER
You will regret following me on Twitter here.
EMAIL
About the author: I've been running this website from 1997. For a living I write stories and essays, program computers, edit
things, and help people launch online publications. (LinkedIn). I wrote a novel. I was an editor at Harper's Magazine for five years; then I was a Contributing Editor; now I am a free agent. I was also on NPR's All Things Considered for a while. I still write for The Morning News, and some other places.
If you have any questions for me, I am very accessible by email. You can email me at ford@ftrain.com and ask me things and I will try to answer. Especially if you want to clarify something or write something critical. I am
glad to clarify things so that you can disagree more effectively.
«Jealousy and Literature
»
POKE
Syndicate: RSS1.0, RSS2.0
Links: RSS1.0, RSS2.0
Contact
© 1974-2011 Paul Ford
Recent
@20, by Paul Ford.
Not any kind of eulogy, thanks. And no header image, either.
(October 15)
Recent Offsite Work: Code and Prose.
As a hobby I write.
(January 14)
Rotary Dial.
(August 21)
10 Timeframes.
(June 20)
Facebook and Instagram: When Your Favorite App Sells Out.
(April 10)
Why I Am Leaving the People of the Red Valley.
(April 7)
Welcome to the Company.
(September 21)
“Facebook and the Epiphanator: An End to Endings?”.
Forgot to tell you about this.
(July 20)
“The Age of Mechanical Reproduction”.
An essay for TheMorningNews.org.
(July 11)
Woods+.
People call me a lot and say: What is this new thing? You're a nerd. Explain it immediately.
(July 10)
Reading Tonight.
Reading!
(May 25)
Recorded Entertainment #2, by Paul Ford.
(May 18)
Recorded Entertainment #1, by Paul Ford.
(May 17)
Nanolaw with Daughter.
Why privacy mattered.
(May 16)
0h30m w/Photoshop, by Paul Ford.
It's immediately clear to me now that I'm writing again that I need to come up with some new forms in order to have fun here—so
that I can get a rhythm and know what I'm doing. One thing that works for me are time limits; pencils up, pencils down. So:
Fridays, write for 30 minutes; edit for 20 minutes max; and go whip up some images if necessary, like the big crappy hand
below that's all meaningful and evocative because it's retro and zoomed-in. Post it, and leave it alone. Can I do that every
Friday? Yes! Will I? Maybe! But I crave that simple continuity. For today, for absolutely no reason other than that it came
unbidden into my brain, the subject will be Photoshop. (Do we have a process? We have a process. It is 11:39 and...)
(May 13)
That Shaggy Feeling.
Soon, orphans.
(May 12)
Antilunchism, by Paul Ford.
Snack trams.
(May 11)
Tickler File Forever, by Paul Ford.
I'll have no one to blame but future me.
(May 10)
Time's Inverted Index, by Paul Ford.
(1) When robots write history we can get in trouble with our past selves. (2) Search-generated, "false" chrestomathies and
the historical fallacy.
(May 9)
Bantha Tracks.
(May 5)
